Symbols And Signs By Vladimir Nabokov Analysis Essay

Essay about Signs and Symbols

2393 Words10 Pages

In the short story “Signs and Symbols,” Vladmir Nabokov entices the reader with the story of a concerned elderly couple who visits their mentally unstable son on his birthday at the sanitarium. This visit is further complicated by the son’s attempt to take his life, which compels the hospital staff at the sanitarium to prevent the parents from meeting their son. This circumstance then embarks on the difficult journey that life has been for this mother and father of their mentally deranged child. Nabokov provides a touching story to his readers and does this through: the illustration of the characters, the setting, and keeps the readers interest by presenting the story in a suspenseful way that it leaves the reader thirsting for more.…show more content…

The story revolves around the son but do to his psychological state he is somewhat detached from the reader. He truly comes on stage when he attempts to suicide and take his life once again. The epitome of the situation makes the reader realize that this person is truly sick who is not in the correct state of mind and needs help. The circumstance mentioned above leads the reader to sympathize with the character. What makes it more understanding is the fact that he is somewhat helpless in the situation due to the control of the hospital staff. One of the minor characters in the story is the nurse who prevented the parents from meeting the son in an attempt that it might disturb them. This just shows how the son is under control of the hospital staff and the parents not being able to meet their son aids to their distress. After the unsuccessful attempt to visit their son in the sanitarium doesn’t work out, the mother’s longing for her son can be seen through the way she examines her son’s childhood photos. The mother envisions all the suffering she had to go through to bring her son up. This makes the character strong and relatable to the reader as if this was the reader’s own mother. While flipping through the photo album, the son’s mother “thought of the endless waves of pain that for some reason or other she and her husband had to endure; at age 6 he suffered from insomnia, age 8 he was afraid of certain pictures in the book, age 10 the year they left Europe,

Show More


      We are delighted to announce the publication of editor Yuri Leving’s “Anatomy of a Short Story: Nabokov’s Puzzles, Codes, ‘Signs and Symbols,’” a book that unites Nobokov’s “Signs and Symbols” as a primary text, with a collection of articles investigating the question of symbolism, “Referential mania,” and “riddles” in “Signs and Symbols,” one of Nabokov’s shortest stories and called “one of the greatest short stories ever written.”

    Vladimir Nobokov opens his short story “Signs and Symbols” with a husband and wife deciding what to bring their “incurably deranged” son for his birthday in a “sanotorium.” The pair decides on a “dainty and innocent trifle”—a collection of fruit jellies. Why, we wonder, fruit jellies for a “deranged” son? Given the story’s title, naturally we might take a seemingly random detail like fruit jellies to symbolize something greater in the story. As Nabokov’s tale unravels, it is revealed that the son is in the sanotorium for his “Referential mania,” an invented term described by a fictional doctor as causing a patient to imagine “that everything happening around him is a veiled reference to his personality and existence.” For a person suffering Referential mania, “Pebbles or stains or sun flecks form patterns representing in some awful way messages which he must intercept. Everything is a cipher and of everything he is the theme.” Nabokov’s inclusion of an illness symptomatized by over-analysis calls to mind the reader’s search for deeper meaning and symbolism in literature. Are we, as careful readers searching for the meaning in a detail like “fruit jellies,” suffering from our own literary form of Referential mania, the search for symbolic meaning in everything around us?

            The anthology begins with the primary text “Signs and Symbols,” with line numbers for academic discussion. Nabokov’s text is followed by an intellectual forum exploring the significance and meaning of the short story in the context of five disciplines: film, theater, mathematics, psychiatry, and literary studies. In the forum, UCLA screenwriter Hal Ackerman posits the questions “What is seen?” and “What is heard?” in the story, and suggests that the meaning of Nabokov’s miniature masterpiece lies in the negative space of the story—what is not seen, what is not heard—revealing a second layer of the story which is at first obscured. Of “Signs and Symbols,” Ackerman states, “All of the power and intensity of the story is laid under the surface, in the back-story, in repressed and fractured and delusional hopes, in off-screen implied events. The compression with which Nabokov expresses all of this in spare prose is his genius.” Mathematician John N. Crossley elaborates upon Ackerman’s ideas about the implicit aspects in “Signs and Symbols” by contrasting literary symbols and mathematic symbols, proposing that in fiction all symbols must be highly contextualized and can yield various interpretations, versus in mathematics, where symbols are stable and “context free.” For Crossley, Nabokov’s “Signs and Symbols” has an unsolvable quality, whereas in mathematics, even the most “unsolvable” equation still has the viable and singular answer “no solution.” Editor Yuri Leving synthesizes the forum by asking all contributors about the final moment of “Signs and Symbols,” in which the parents of the “deranged” son receive a phone call which is either a wrong number, or a call about the suicide of their son. The identity of the caller is never revealed—ultimately, Nabokov leaves it up to us to determine the outcome of the call, whether we decide the follow his symbols, and how symbols in the text may or may not be interpreted depending on our own degree of “Referential mania.”

            A charming and enlightening two-year long correspondence between Nabokov and The New Yorker editor Katherine Sargeant Angel White—the longest Nabokov-The New Yorker correspondence for any of the writer’s stories—follows the forum. In the exchange, we see that White questioned whether “Signs and Symbols” was a parody or straight fiction, and that for White, overly “realistic” details signaled satire. Questions about Nabokov’s literary intentions bring to mind larger questions about realistic fiction, leading readers of Anatomy of a Short Story to reconsider Nabokov’s inclusion of those so-called “real” and “gruesome” details in the story, and also to consider what constitutes a realistic fiction in the first place, and the degree to which readers are willing to accept “real” details about life in fiction categorized as “realism.”

            The correspondence is followed by a range of scholarly debates about “Signs and Symbols,” the most recent piece published in 2011 by Meghan Vicks, who has recently finished her phD dissertation discussing narratives of zero in modern and post-modern literature, and the earliest critical essay by William C. Carroll, first published in 1974, and the first critical article ever published about “Signs and Symbols.”

            An illumination of both “Signs and Symbols” and how we understand fiction, Anatomy of a Short Story is described as a “challenging exercise of ‘Practical Criticism’ which touches upon the bone and structure of Nabokov’s work.”

Hilary Reid

Editorial Intern

0 thoughts on “Symbols And Signs By Vladimir Nabokov Analysis Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *