Difficulties Met In Essay Format

This article reports a research study conducted with four chemistry teachers in three high schools (two government schools and one private school) in Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. The study investigated questions concerning common difficulties high school (Grades 9 and 10) students experience in chemistry classroom, the possible reasons for these difficulties, and the ways in which teachers help students overcome these difficulties. A qualitative case study method was used to investigate the questions, which used in-depth interviews with teachers, classroom observation, and postobservation discussion with the teachers, as main data collection tools. The key findings of the study allude to a huge gap between what is intended in the National Curriculum in terms of students’ learning in chemistry and what actually happens in the classroom where students learn chemistry. Promoting in-depth learning appeared to be an uphill task for the teachers. The main hurdle lies in students’ inability to demonstrate a good understanding of very basic concepts of the subject. Despite faced with such a challenge, the teachers appear to be committed to teaching their subject. The implications of the results of the study are explained in the context of schools, teachers, and other educational stakeholders by emphasizing the need for synchronization and integration of efforts on the part of schools.

References

Click the "References" link above to hide these references.

Berninger, V., Mizokawa, D., & Bragg, R. (199 1). Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57-97.

Berninger, V., Vaughn, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Rogan, L. Brooks, A., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652-666.

Berninger, V., Vaughn, K., Abbott, R., Brooks, A., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., Reed, E., & Graham, S. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587-605.

Christenson, S., Thurlow, M., Ysseldyke, J., & McVicar, R. (1989). Written language instruction for children with mild handicaps: Is there enough quantity to ensure quality? Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 219-229.

Dahl, K., & Freeport, P. (199 1). Literacy learning in whole language classrooms: An analysis of low socioeconomic urban children learning to read and write in kindergarten. In J. Zutell & S. McCormick (Eds.), Learner factors/teacher factors: Issues in literacy research and instruction (pp. 149-15 8). Chicago, IL: National Reading Conference.

DeFord, S. (1998). High tech for the disabled. Washington Post: Education Review, July 26, 4-30.

Englert, C., Garmon, A., Mariage, T., Rozendal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The Early Literacy Project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 253-275.

Englert, C., Hiebert, E., Stewart, S. (1985). Spelling unfamiliar words by an analogy strategy. Journal of Special Education, 19,291-306.

Englert, C., Raphael, 1, Anderson, L., Anthony, H., Stevens, D., & Fear, K. (1991). Making writing and self-talk visible: Cognitive strategy instruction writing in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-373.

Englert, C., Raphael, 1, Fear, K., & Anderson, L. (1988). Students' metacognitive knowledge about how to write informational texts. Learning Disability Quarterly, 11, 18-46.

Gaskins, 1. (1998). There's more to teaching at-risk and delayed readers than good reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 51, 534-547.

Gordon, J., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, S. (1993). Spelling interventions: A review of literature and implications for instruction for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities and Research, 8, 175-181.

Graham, S. (2000). Should the natural learning approach replace spelling instruction? Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 235-247.

Graham, S. (1999). Handwriting and spelling instruction for students with learning disabilities: A review. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 78- 98.

Graham, S. (1997). Executive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 223-234.

Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 781-791.

Graham, S. (1983). Effective spelling instruction. Elementary School Journal, 83, 560-567.

Graham, S., Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., & Whitaker, D. (1997). The role of mechanics in composing of elementary school students: A new methodological approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 170-182.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The road less traveled: Prevention and intervention in written language. In K. Butler & E. Silliman (Eds.), The language learning disabilities continuum.- Integration of research, technology, and education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaurn.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 3-12.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997a). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102-114.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997b). It can be taught, but it does not develop naturally: Myths and realities in writing instruction. School Psychology Review, 26, 414-424.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1997c). Whole language and process writing: Does one approach fit all? In J. Lloyd, E. Kame'enui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 239-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1996). Self-regulation and strategy instruction for students who find writing and learning challenging. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 347-360). Mahwah, NJ: Erbaurn.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1994). Implications of constructivism for teaching writing to students with special needs. Journal of Special Education, 28, 275-289.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1988). Instructional recommendations for teaching writing to exceptional students. Exceptional Children, 54, 506- 512.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write: Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., Fink, B., & MacArthur, C. (2000). How do primary grade teachers adapt instruction to meet individual needs in writing? Manuscript submitted for publication.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (199 1 a). Writing instruction. In B. Wong, (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 391-423). New York: Academic Press.

Graham, S., Harris, K. R., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. (1991b). Writing and writing instruction with students with learning disabilities: A review of a program of research. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 89-114.

Graham, S., & MacArthur, C. (1988). Improving learning disabled students' skills at revising essays produced on a word processor: Self- Instructional strategy training. Journal of Special Education, 22, 133-152.

Graham, S., Schwartz, S., & MacArthur, C. (1993). Knowledge of writing and the composing process, attitude toward writing, and self- efficacy for students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 237-249.

Harris, K. R. (1982). Cognitive-behavior modification: Application with exceptional children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 15, 1-16.

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of Self-Regulated Strategy Development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251-262.

Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Reid, R, McElroy, K., & Hamby, R. (1994). Self-monitoring of attention versus self-monitoring of performance: Replication and cross-task comparison studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 121-139.

Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: National Conference on Research in English.

Johnston, P., & Winograd, P. (1985). Passive failure in reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17,279-301.

Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). The relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44-49.

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.

Kame'enui, E. (1993). Diverse learners and the tyranny of time: Don't fix blame; fix the leaky roof. Reading Teacher, 46, 376-383.

MacArthur, C. (1999). Overcoming barriers to writing: Computer support for basic writing skills. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 15,169-192.

MacArthur, C. (1996). Using technology to enhance the writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 344-354.

MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students' composing with three methods: Handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Journal of Special Education, 21, 22-42.

MacArthur, C., Graham, S., Haynes, J., & De La Paz, S. (1996). Spelling checkers and students with learning disabilities: Performance comparisons and impact on spelling. Journal of Special Education, 30, 35-57.

Maheady, L., Harper, G., Mallette, B., & Winstanley, N. (199 1). Training and implementing requirements associated with the use of classwide peer tutoring. Education and Treatment Of Children, 14, 177-198.

Mariage, T. (December 1993). The systemic influence of the Early Literacy Project curriculum: A four-year longitudinal study of student achievement from first to fourth grade. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Reading Conference, Charleston, SC.

O'Connor, R., Notari-Syverson, A., & Vadasy, P. (1998). Ladders to Literacy: A kindergarten activity book. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

Palinscar, A., Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 211-225.

Pressley, M. (1998). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.

Pressley, M., Rankin, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Elementary School Journal, 96, 363-384.

Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Rankin, J., Mistretta, J., & Yokoi, L. (1996). The nature of outstanding primary-grades literacy instruction. In E. McIntyre & M. Pressley (Eds.), Balanced instruction: Strategies and skills in whole language (pp. 251-276). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.

Pressley, M., Yokoi, L., Rankin, J., Wharton-McDonald, R., & Hampston, J. (1997). A survey of instructional practices of grade-5 teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 145-160.

Scott, C. (1989). Problem writers: Nature, assessment, and intervention. In A. Kamhi & H. Catts (Eds.), Reading disabilities.A developmental language perspective (pp. 303-344). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Sexton, M., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64, 295-311.

Thomas, C., Englert, C., & Gregg, S. (1987). An analysis of errors and strategies in the expository writing of learning disabled students. Remedial and Special Education, 8, 21-30.

Troia, G., Roth, F., & Graham, S. (1998). An educator's guide to phonological awareness: Assessment measures and intervention activities for children. Focus on Exceptional Children, 30, 1-12.

Westby, C., & Costlow, L. (199 1). Implementing a whole language program in a special education class. Topics in Language Disorders, 11, 69- 84.

Wong, B. (1997). Research on genre-specific strategies for enhancing writing in adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 140-159.

Wong, B., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents' composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 310-323.

Wray, D., Medwell, J., Fox, R., & Poulson, L. (2000). The teaching practices of effective teachers of literacy Educational Review, 52, 75-84.

0 thoughts on “Difficulties Met In Essay Format

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *